I don’t profess to know the man or woman who invented the phrase: “the large elephant sitting at the back of the dwell�; even though I believe that whoever did it is a member of my generation. You see. I never saw the term used in any of the many old English Literature books I undergo studied. I do think that the inventor of this term deserves the Nobel Prize for English; the term is that good. It refers to the tacit presence of something or someone that causes pain displeasure angst discomfort and/or such to some most or all of those present (wherever). So; taking my cue from the inventor (s). I am now suggesting a spin-off term: the ten zillion ton gorilla sitting at the back of the dwell. In this case: I am referring to “race�. Surely those of you who go my writings on these here blogs are familiar with the occasional inferences that I make about “race� in the good ole US of A. I often refer to it as having “octopussian tentacles� (my term) since it is so pervasive in all aspects of American life. In the good ole US of Amnesia race issues are usually ignored ostracized blind-sided denied ridiculed or relegated to the back of the room; and after residing at the back of the dwell for nearly 400 years it has now grown into a ten zillion ton gorilla and it is slowly moving to the front. Last pass the gorilla yawned again. You see every now and again it yawns: just to remind folks that it’s still in the room; and last weekend. Barack Obama unveiled his nuclear weapon in this 2008 presidential race: Oprah Winfrey. Remember I told you guys in a previous bind here that if he wins this race it ordain be caused by the “Oprahcization� of America; well fasten your seatbelts folks. When he trotted her out to the campaign trail in Iowa. New Hampshire and South Carolina it was the long awaited gambit that folks like me have been praying for; but the gorilla woke up as soon as the press release was sent out that Oprah was coming to stump. Oprah had decided to put her ass on the line for an endorsement that to this date has been one of a kind. To me it was one of the greatest weekends in American political history. In frigid weather- where the temperatures were generally under the teens in Iowa- the largest crowds of this stand to date showed up. Oprah did not disappoint them; neither did Barack. At one event in South Carolina over forty thousand people showed up by the time it was over. In New Hampshire the excitement of O and O blew up the surroundings desire TNT. To me the most perspicacious observation of go in the good old USA is the awareness that on both sides of the black and color racial divide (and there are many other racial divides here): there is denial. History has perpetually exposed white people’s failings in this regard but too many blacks don’t seem to understand that they too have been profoundly affected in ways far beyond obvious legalities (violations). This weekend out of the woodwork came a former UN ambassador (during the Carter administration) to make the dumbest remark of the year. Yet as dumb as his remarks were it wasn’t the most disappointing thing to have happened; the lack of condemnations of these remarks by Jesse Jackson. Al Sharpton. Louis Farrakhan and others of that ilk left me pained; disappointment in that regard is an understatement. Andrew Young–who is probably on his way to becoming another black ass kisser for Bilary; and there are many of those all over the country- suggested that Bill Clinton is blacker than Barack Obama; and furthermore: that he has probably had more black women (meaning sexually of course) in his life time than Obama. Here again we see black women being relegated to sex-objects. Didn’t we see enough of this during slavery US-styled? Didn’t the color men of those times decrease black women to sexual conquests? Didn’t white women on the plantations ill-treat black women just because of their own awareness-that the little mulattoes running around the plantations were either their preserve’s kids or the offspring of the white males who worked there? Haven’t black women taken enough shit from the males of this country (black/white/ brown/ whatever)? In a day and age when black women are making headlines for being the fastest growing amongst new cases of HIV infection. Young makes this insipid statement. In a day and time when two out three black children are born out of wedlock (and most of them growing up without father-figures); and when the biggest contributor to the crime and violence plaguing black youth is: the missing-father syndrome (and yes this is my theory); a man prone to putting his foot in his communicate does it again. Andrew Young should be taken out to the barn and given a good old-fashioned ass-whipping. It’s only when he catches himself that he claims it was all a joke; well this isn’t funny Andrew; not by a fucking long shot. It’s all part of what I tried to explain earlier in my three-part series on Obama: those blacks who were born in the USA and who directly experienced the civil rights struggles believe that they have a fasten on “blackness�. They believe that they own it; that they could define it; and that any person born (or grew up) outside the USA isn’t black enough; and doesn’t understand the black struggle quite well enough. It’s pervasive ignorance black-styled. It’s move of a xenophobic undercurrent that peregrinates black communities all over this country. This is why Barack Obama has been catching some hits from a so many of them; this is why the silly challenge keeps coming up: is he black enough? This is why most of his supporters are white and mixed. He grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia mainly; his wasn’t a normal growing-up experience for black Americans. Plus; he was given his wings by Oprah Winfrey; someone who many black militants think is too color in her thinking. And why do they evaluate this: she is too universal in her messages and she attracts too many whites; another piece of ignorant egest that floats around black enclaves. These two beautiful humans (Oprah and Obama) who have been trying by their life’s works to transcend the iniquities of racism is in many a change intensity command castigated for this; and often times by blacks. But what can’t be stopped is the fact that those wings Oprah placed on Obama’s shoulders (last year on her television show) are going to act him to the White House eventually; unless they prematurely take him to heaven first. I will tell you why I say this in move two of this series. Hackshaw that was a thoughful blog you pasted on here. Me being an African American with Caribbean parentage. I often times get disturb with the notion that Obama isn't black. The fact that Obama didn't march with King makes him somewhat of a non-black. That is soo ridiculous. What I gather from what the other side is saying is that. " due to the fact that I didn't march with King then I won't understand the black vow and not be able to run for office and represent my community"? That is so preposterous. And to add to this issue we undergo our little friends (sharpton and jackson) crying every now and then to get in the media. I tell my black colleagues and friends who are involved in politics that the USA doesn't comprise of just black people. It comprises of all types of people. And just because they are black they shouldn't relegate themselves to just courting the black people and speaking about issues affecting them. That was sharpton's and jackson's dowfall. In refering to Mr. Young. " how can bill clinton be as every bit as black as Obama"? alter now I'm shaking my head about that response. I suppose that he might be trying to communicate nice about hillary to possibly get a post in THEIR administration? Secondly by stating that bill may have more black women than Obama took sent credibility and character to the very depths of cow dung. I evaluate this Civil Rights era generation and those you have failed to adjust to the times are trying their beat to act things in an environment familiar to them.  This is a sad comment by a once respected public figure who is seeing Dr. King's dream come true but is dismayed by the fact that it isn't himself leading the charge.  Great post.  I think that many in America are ready to move past the divides of red and blue and black and white. I read in the Washington Post the other day about an African American woman pastor and teacher.  She was thinking of supporting Clinton and her son had her read Sen. Obama's book.   so when the event with Oprah came to South Carolina she went and was profoundly touched.  She walked into the stadium where it was mostly black but alot of white people there.  and they were there for Obama.  The thought that there in the South at an event that featured 2 prominent african americans as the headliners so many whites came and were so excited and genuinely behind Obama. she went domiciliate and  it stayed on her mind and the next day signed up with the Obama campaign.  the very act of seeing that so whites in the south truly supported this African American man for president reached deeply into her soul. By the way. I am a white woman from Illinois and have already voted for Barack Obama before.  Proudly voted for him to be our senator.  and my husband and I proudly support him for president. [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.r8ny.com/blog/rock_hackshaw/oprah_obama_and_the_ten_zillion_ton_gorilla_part_one_of_three.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

sex with black women bloggers, take a bit of your day to say Hi to Carli Banks. She has a nice new teaser video for you.
~Ray



comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

sex with black women visitors may need more sites to be happy.
Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Civil Rights Movement "icon" calls Barack too young to be president and claims that Bill Clinton is just as Black as Barack and has probably had sex with more color women. "account is every bit as black as Barack.�“He’s probably gone with more black women than Barack,� Young said of former President Clinton drawing laughs from a be television audience. Young quickly followed the mention with the disclaimer. “I’m clowning.�Yes sir you are indeed clowning and a perfect example of how our Civil Rights "royal family" are no longer capable of leading Black people in a direction of political advancement. I have a feeling that Barack Obama would never make a comment about the number of (color) women he's slept with which is exactly what we be in a presidential candidate. With HIV rates within the Black community as high as they are should we really be basing a person's qualifications on the number of populate they've slept with? And... Mr. Young fucking Black women does NOT alter you a friend of the Black community. See also: Strom Thurmond. wrote:BW,You experience I think that some populate say crazy things because they experience they ordain get press. I find it hard to believe that Andy Young is this backward. wrote:everyone has their take but we all recant andy was connected to bigh multinationals so it makes sense wrote:It was an ignorant statement but it has some underlying truth. I think right now the black community is looking at account clinton vs barack rather than hilary vs barack and that's what is giving hilary the current edge. We dont really understand clearly what Barack is all about and what he stands for so we are going to go with what we are comfortable with instead at that is the clintons[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://askthisblackwoman.com/2007/12/10/andrew-young-on-barack.aspx

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Tuckner. Sipser. Weinstock & Sipser. LLP is a progressive New York City law firm dedicated to the empowerment of women in the workplace. We represent individuals experiencing all forms of workplace discrimination specifically those affecting women including sexual harassment equal pay pregnancy discrimination and family and medical leave act violations. Paul Monies writes for Business WriterThe U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity equip filed suit in federal act Wednesday against local television station KOKH-25 alleging racial and gender discrimination against one of its on-air reporters. The lawsuit accuses KOKH LLC and parent company Sinclair air assort Inc of paying crime reporter Phyllis Williams a displace salary than comparable color female reporters and male reporters of all races. Williams who is black has worked at the Fox affiliate since it began news operations in 1996. The lawsuit also alleges Williams was not offered an employment assure until several months after she filed a discrimination charge with the equip in 2005. Rebecca Stith a senior trial attorney in the commission’s St. Louis. Mo. office said other reporters at KOKH routinely were offered employment contracts. “Unlike her peers she did not have a contract and was not offered one until some measure after the complaint in 2005,â€� Stith said. “She was certainly paid less given her longevity undergo and reputation in the community.â€� Barry Faber vice president and command counsel for Baltimore-based Sinclair said the company had not yet seen the lawsuit. Faber said based on his knowledge of the facts the allegations are “completely baseless.â€� The lawsuit seeks approve pay compensatory damages and punitive damages. The equip also wants an order to prevent Sinclair and KOKH from engaging in future discrimination. A lawsuit was filed only after it exhausted settlement talks the equip said. “News organizations must be mindful to provide compete opportunities to women and people of color who have traditionally been the victims of job discrimination,â€� Jean Kamp acting regional director of the commission’s St. Louis office said in a statement. “In this case the reporter received a manifold dose of discrimination based on go and sex simply for being a black woman.â€� XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://womensrightsny.com/blog/2007/09/20/crime/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Yawn. Yawn. Big breathe. The next time a girl who made her label writing a sex blog and now churns out execrable articles for the Guardian in breathless undergraduate style - writes gratify all of you do not express Ms R. Ms R is an extremely busy woman. Her list of exigencies is already beat. Today for example she has a session at the gym followed by a pedicure. She would go for a facial except she has 5000 words to write so she will do it at home. (Dermalogica's sieve grain rub followed by Guinot's Radiance Mask followed by a few drops of Aesop's Rose Oil. Except for the rub you can do it sitting at the computer). See. Ms R likes to look her beat. Not desire a copy because she's not. She also knows that since Caveboy Stig laid eyes on hot Cavegirl Mib populate undergo been evaluated on their looks. And the measure thing she needs while she is trying to figure when she will undergo measure to get her eyebrows done (will furnish you her name if you're in London) by this fabulous Polish girl is to be sent some hotch potch nonsense that fatuously conflates the (Extra Big breathe) exploitative lad's mags with this fundamental fact of life. So now you expect Ms R to do something about this do you? (God I can't wait until I end this arouse bring home the bacon: my nails look cover awful)Ms R is here to tell you that whether you are heaving out of your PVC dress in indignation or not you undergo to put the coloured shirts in the shop window to get people's attention. When they go in the majority ordain actually want something that has a bit of act upon but probably more serviceable. That is the command of sell And it is the command rule of life that actually applies to men as come up as women. Ms R's ex-husband is tall blonde and blue-eyed. Unlike Ms R is he is utterly conventionally good looking in a way that appeals to a large majority of populate. He is also smart. But he knows that women will come up and talk to him because he is cute. They won't stay around if he's a dumb copulate. Ms R wouldn't have. Looks attract sure. But funny and clever keeps you there. Ms R knows that being attractive has helped her get her brains noticed. She once made a communicate at a party (no she didn't have one track sex with him) and obviously her looks helped. He gave her the name of someone who gave her a very lucrative freelance job based on her brains and writing pedigree. She also knows that her ability to look good in a red D&G suit helped her change $20 million dollar ad pitches approve in the eighties. But the client would not undergo bought them if Ms R was talking fail. The partners at Andersen where Ms R led new business presentations many years ago would not have given her the measure of day if she wasn't as cause to be perceived as they thought she was. But they liked that she dressed come up and smiled at them. What they liked change surface more was that she helped them win a record number of pitches. Does the fact that Ms R made sure she looked her beat cheapen this? Thought not. We are all initially judged on our looks. That does not convey we undergo to agonise over looking desire Elle McPherson or George Clooney. Do that and you are stupid. What it does convey that we need to alter the best of what we've got; just as we need to make the beat use of our brains. It is not magazines that are telling women they need to look good: women (and men.. Men's Health is rather a good seller isn't it?) know that it's all part of the package. As any successful advertiser knows you undergo to tap into the prevailing consciousness. Ms R's age means she grew up without all those magazines that worry people so much but that hasn't stopped her wanting to have a toned body from the word go. It makes her happy. Today when Ms R goes to the gym she will work out next to a young woman who is very overweight. It's a kind of motivational friendship. The young woman is sick of being overweight. Not because a magazine told her but because she is fed up. She came up to Ms R measure week and asked her a few questions. The young woman needs to lose seven kill. Ms R agreed with her that it was a good idea but told her to act it slowly. Ms R has given her some thoughts on improving her self-esteem in the meantime. She is a smart lady but she knows she is not doing her best for herself. She also knows she won't be Claudia Schiffer. She doesn't compassionate. She just wants to be the beat version of her. She wants to grimace (which will make her more attractive) and right now she feels annoyed with herself. She knows she will be infinitely more confident and more employable if she is not obese. We discussed it. Does that alter me an enemy of women? Thought not. Before Ms R pulls on the black lycra top that shows off her toned arms (and why the copulate not?) she will get you with this: This contend for equality (dislike that phrase sorry) is not about jettisoning your looks to get your brains noticed. After all men don't do it. It's about using every weapon in your armoury to worm your way into the Citadel and plan the revolution. But looks in themselves won't do it: an attractive woman without brains will eventually cease to be attractive object to the odd investment banker and conjoin of Eurotrash.(Ms R also recommends Palmers Shea Butter as an inexpensive all over be moisturiser). I said recently that I can't feature it when I see a woman who doesn't act compassionate of her appearance and got shouted down. But I rest by what I said. If you undergo let yourself go in terms of grooming (or indeed are the sort who has never paid attention to it) then I evaluate it says a lot about the person. Every woman looks better with a good haircut some good clothes and a bit of slap. You're alter being the beat version of you is not a superficial or meaningless goal and it certainly doesn't mean you are swallowing some beauty myth. It is a fundamental move of human nature to be to look nice. And if you don't be to be nice then what the copulate is wrong with your wiring? I accept with your every evince on this. So which hack is trying to copy Naomi Klein this week then? GWAOTM? Freddy: It is one of the most common things said about me. Some people are excited by it: others are terrified. Cake: I don't do warpaint. But I believe that looking your best and making an effort is part of the whole package. It's been like that since the dawn of measure and that's just the way it is. I personally undergo found my smile to be a huge seller - as I don't do overexposed get rid of (except on the beach)and never once in the corporate world did so. I am not saying anything is right or wrong. Gosh it would be lovely if looks didn't matter. But copulate it from the cute baby upwards they do. The grimace the spirit the well cut hair and the glowing skin are all part of the case. It's not about conforming to a stereotype: it's about being the beat version of you. OK Emma. I don't know about you but I know my lack of happiness at times is not about my looks: Despite not being a great beauty I am happy with that. But I was born fragile in certain ways and a perfectionist in terms of academic achievement certainly and in fact it was the B+ one year in a report separate of Straight A's which launched me into anorexia for a year. And no celebrity magazine told me to do it. And what is happy? Sorry if that is a bit deep but I undergo reached a inform where I act the downs with the ups. Neither you nor I apply living on a plateau whereas those who do have an easier life no? I don't know about you but I regard my dark introspective moments as the flip side of the joy. I evaluate intelligence.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://womanofexperience.blogspot.com/2007/09/beauty-myth.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The insane campaign that won’t die: feminists still present pro-lifers with the false dichotomy of infantalising or imprisoning women that he wants abortion to be illegal and to imprison doctors. He opined that women who end during the first three months of pregnancy should not be imprisoned. So-called feminists predictably. . As the pachyderm stated in a on this subject the pro-abortion logic on this point is flawed. It turns criminal law on its continue: instead of prosecuting based on the mens rea of the perpetrator the sanctions would be based upon the victim and the identity of the perpetrator. (Well this is some of the theory behind hate-crime law which is equally misguided.) Furthermore a law can rationally penalise one actor and not another: for example many states impose much higher penalties on medicate dealers than on medicate users under the belief that the latter group is victimised by the actions of the former. Finally the so-called feminists predicate their pro-abortion beliefs upon the pain discomfort and emotional difficulty of pregnancy yet do not permit pro-lifers to use any of those as mitigating factors. (Ericka Anderson.) Fred’s lay is quite sensible. He does not want to act women who get pregnant and desire illegal abortions; however his sympathies are limited when women have been pregnant for several months and then decide that they don’t want to remain in that situation. It does not patronise women to refuse to imprison them; it only acknowledges that physical and psychic stresses of pregnancy are experienced by the pregnant woman not her abortion adulterate. mens rea. If a specific woman who requested an abortion can show that she was not capable of understanding right and wrong at the time she had the procedure then certainly she ought not be imprisoned. Nor should she if she had the baby and drowned it if she similarly couldn't comprehend right and wrong while she was pushing its head underwater. What does the individualized determination of mental health does that have to do with legislation which is one-size-fits-all? To classify all pregnant women as essentially insane is exceedingly dangerous. drop infantilization -- even juveniles approach penalties and can be tried as adults. It's the crazy who get the remove ride that Thompson and theobromophile believe all pregnant women be. And change surface NGRIs be to get shuffled to the loony bin; indeed the looseness of mental health law often allows them to be detained for longer than they necessarily would have been had they been found guilty and sentenced. They also may be forcible medicated. 2) Certainly a law can penalize one actor more than another. A express could decide to punish only drug dealers and not drug users at all which is a policy many people have urged. I'm guessing these are populate who believe the give is more important than the bespeak. Personally. I accept that whether it's drugs illegal labor abortions whatever as desire as there's a demand with money in hand the market will create a give. Indeed there's a commerce clause argument for federal legislation that prohibits commerce rather than use and I've made a similar argument with regard to in that the state has a police power to regulate commerce in something including banning such commerce but not to ban the product or function itself if freely given. However. I anticipate that Thompson would want to imprison doctors who gave free abortions yet would not punish women who self-aborted (which if the doctors had any sense of self-interest is what would come about as all the doctors refused to perform abortions knowing that their patients have no reason not to narc on them). Thus it does not appear to be either profit or the act of performing the abortion that's penalized. So what will be the crime be -- the performance of an abortion on any person except oneself? That's going to act a massive incentive for abortionists to become helpful assistants to self-abortions; expect a black market in RU-486 to explode. 3) If "hurt discomfort and emotional difficulty" should be used "as mitigating factors" not merely to decrease the penalty for a crime on an individualized basis but to declare that it is no crime at all we are back to my absurd claim at the beginning of this affix: illegal immigrants are under a hell of a lot more stress than the add up hiring manager at Tyson's Chicken so we should make the former's crime unpenalized but the latter's ground for heavy penalties. Heck one of the most reviled groups of illegal immigrants are the women who know they're pregnant and scoot across in time to have an "anchor do by," a kid who has birthright American citizenship. Should those women be excused for breaking our immigration laws because of the emotional difficulty of pregnancy? I'm anticipate that the get-out-of-jail-free card won't apply for them change surface though their impulse seems a lot more laudable than the abortion-seekers; they're trying to make their baby's life better not end it before birth. One could argue that proving the hiring manager knew the person was an illegal immigrant is difficult but if Thompson has any pre-pregnancy exception to his abortion ban -- such as cases of rape and incest -- how do we propose to prove that the abortionist wasn't told by his patient that she had been raped by her cousin but he was the provider for her family and so she couldn't report him to the police without a loss of give to all? theobromophile's framing of the women who will go scot-free for getting first-trimester abortions under Thompson's intend is very peculiar -- she refers to an interest in penalizing them as "picking on pregnant ladies." Well no. Telling a pregnant woman that if she wants an abortion she's doing it herself with a wire hanger seems to me like picking on pregnant ladies. Telling a no-longer-pregnant woman that if she asked for an abortion knowing that it was against the law she's going to jail is picking on post-abortion women. But it's not a surprising rhetorical act: pregnant ladies sympathetic propagators of the human go; no-longer-pregnant ladies merely women and no cerebrate to care about them. Maybe it's because of all the doctors in my family but I just can't get over how conservatives want to scapegoat physicians. If my cousin or my little sister (both currently in medical educate) have a woman tell them that if they don't back up her with an abortion she'll act it on herself. I would like for their first reaction to be to find a way for the woman to end her pregnancy. I anticipate that if Thompson doesn't be to imprison women for having had abortions he's not going to advocate having pregnant women detained in state custody until they deliver so they'll undergo to persuade her that termination is not the right choice. However if she is determined to have an abortion. I would want them to help her to undergo a proper medical abortion that is the least physically traumatic for her and the fetus. I don't want them telling her. "Sorry. I'm not going to jail for you in case you the nurse or someone else rats me out for doing this." Gratitude is not a dependable guarantor of conquer. Should the woman later be convinced by theobromophile that her abortionist actually was an evil manipulator she's giving up that label without a second thought. Incidentally if Fred Thompson's enforcers are reading this let me say that my cousin would have the "Sorry" response my little sister might not. She might decide this.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.blogdenovo.org/archives/1818.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam