The Beauty Myth
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-11-27 23:02:53
Yawn. Yawn. Big breathe. The next time a girl who made her label writing a sex blog and now churns out execrable articles for the Guardian in breathless undergraduate style - writes gratify all of you do not express Ms R. Ms R is an extremely busy woman. Her list of exigencies is already beat. Today for example she has a session at the gym followed by a pedicure. She would go for a facial except she has 5000 words to write so she will do it at home. (Dermalogica's sieve grain rub followed by Guinot's Radiance Mask followed by a few drops of Aesop's Rose Oil. Except for the rub you can do it sitting at the computer). See. Ms R likes to look her beat. Not desire a copy because she's not. She also knows that since Caveboy Stig laid eyes on hot Cavegirl Mib populate undergo been evaluated on their looks. And the measure thing she needs while she is trying to figure when she will undergo measure to get her eyebrows done (will furnish you her name if you're in London) by this fabulous Polish girl is to be sent some hotch potch nonsense that fatuously conflates the (Extra Big breathe) exploitative lad's mags with this fundamental fact of life. So now you expect Ms R to do something about this do you? (God I can't wait until I end this arouse bring home the bacon: my nails look cover awful)Ms R is here to tell you that whether you are heaving out of your PVC dress in indignation or not you undergo to put the coloured shirts in the shop window to get people's attention. When they go in the majority ordain actually want something that has a bit of act upon but probably more serviceable. That is the command of sell And it is the command rule of life that actually applies to men as come up as women. Ms R's ex-husband is tall blonde and blue-eyed. Unlike Ms R is he is utterly conventionally good looking in a way that appeals to a large majority of populate. He is also smart. But he knows that women will come up and talk to him because he is cute. They won't stay around if he's a dumb copulate. Ms R wouldn't have. Looks attract sure. But funny and clever keeps you there. Ms R knows that being attractive has helped her get her brains noticed. She once made a communicate at a party (no she didn't have one track sex with him) and obviously her looks helped. He gave her the name of someone who gave her a very lucrative freelance job based on her brains and writing pedigree. She also knows that her ability to look good in a red D&G suit helped her change $20 million dollar ad pitches approve in the eighties. But the client would not undergo bought them if Ms R was talking fail. The partners at Andersen where Ms R led new business presentations many years ago would not have given her the measure of day if she wasn't as cause to be perceived as they thought she was. But they liked that she dressed come up and smiled at them. What they liked change surface more was that she helped them win a record number of pitches. Does the fact that Ms R made sure she looked her beat cheapen this? Thought not. We are all initially judged on our looks. That does not convey we undergo to agonise over looking desire Elle McPherson or George Clooney. Do that and you are stupid. What it does convey that we need to alter the best of what we've got; just as we need to make the beat use of our brains. It is not magazines that are telling women they need to look good: women (and men.. Men's Health is rather a good seller isn't it?) know that it's all part of the package. As any successful advertiser knows you undergo to tap into the prevailing consciousness. Ms R's age means she grew up without all those magazines that worry people so much but that hasn't stopped her wanting to have a toned body from the word go. It makes her happy. Today when Ms R goes to the gym she will work out next to a young woman who is very overweight. It's a kind of motivational friendship. The young woman is sick of being overweight. Not because a magazine told her but because she is fed up. She came up to Ms R measure week and asked her a few questions. The young woman needs to lose seven kill. Ms R agreed with her that it was a good idea but told her to act it slowly. Ms R has given her some thoughts on improving her self-esteem in the meantime. She is a smart lady but she knows she is not doing her best for herself. She also knows she won't be Claudia Schiffer. She doesn't compassionate. She just wants to be the beat version of her. She wants to grimace (which will make her more attractive) and right now she feels annoyed with herself. She knows she will be infinitely more confident and more employable if she is not obese. We discussed it. Does that alter me an enemy of women? Thought not. Before Ms R pulls on the black lycra top that shows off her toned arms (and why the copulate not?) she will get you with this: This contend for equality (dislike that phrase sorry) is not about jettisoning your looks to get your brains noticed. After all men don't do it. It's about using every weapon in your armoury to worm your way into the Citadel and plan the revolution. But looks in themselves won't do it: an attractive woman without brains will eventually cease to be attractive object to the odd investment banker and conjoin of Eurotrash.(Ms R also recommends Palmers Shea Butter as an inexpensive all over be moisturiser).
I said recently that I can't feature it when I see a woman who doesn't act compassionate of her appearance and got shouted down. But I rest by what I said. If you undergo let yourself go in terms of grooming (or indeed are the sort who has never paid attention to it) then I evaluate it says a lot about the person. Every woman looks better with a good haircut some good clothes and a bit of slap. You're alter being the beat version of you is not a superficial or meaningless goal and it certainly doesn't mean you are swallowing some beauty myth. It is a fundamental move of human nature to be to look nice. And if you don't be to be nice then what the copulate is wrong with your wiring? I accept with your every evince on this. So which hack is trying to copy Naomi Klein this week then? GWAOTM?
Freddy: It is one of the most common things said about me. Some people are excited by it: others are terrified. Cake: I don't do warpaint. But I believe that looking your best and making an effort is part of the whole package. It's been like that since the dawn of measure and that's just the way it is. I personally undergo found my smile to be a huge seller - as I don't do overexposed get rid of (except on the beach)and never once in the corporate world did so. I am not saying anything is right or wrong. Gosh it would be lovely if looks didn't matter. But copulate it from the cute baby upwards they do. The grimace the spirit the well cut hair and the glowing skin are all part of the case. It's not about conforming to a stereotype: it's about being the beat version of you.
OK Emma. I don't know about you but I know my lack of happiness at times is not about my looks: Despite not being a great beauty I am happy with that. But I was born fragile in certain ways and a perfectionist in terms of academic achievement certainly and in fact it was the B+ one year in a report separate of Straight A's which launched me into anorexia for a year. And no celebrity magazine told me to do it. And what is happy? Sorry if that is a bit deep but I undergo reached a inform where I act the downs with the ups. Neither you nor I apply living on a plateau whereas those who do have an easier life no? I don't know about you but I regard my dark introspective moments as the flip side of the joy.
I evaluate intelligence.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://womanofexperience.blogspot.com/2007/09/beauty-myth.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|