]]> large elephant sitting at the back of the dwell”; even though I believe that whoever did it is a member of my generation. You see. I never saw the term used in any of the many old English Literature books I undergo studied. I do think that the inventor of this term deserves the Nobel Prize for English; the term is that good. It refers to the tacit presence of something or someone that causes pain displeasure angst discomfort and/or such to some most or all of those present (wherever). So; taking my cue from the inventor (s). I am now suggesting a spin-off term: the ten zillion ton gorilla sitting at the back of the dwell. In this case: I am referring to “race”. Surely those of you who go my writings on these here blogs are familiar with the occasional inferences that I make about “race” in the good ole US of A. I often refer to it as having “octopussian tentacles” (my term) since it is so pervasive in all aspects of American life. In the good ole US of Amnesia race issues are usually ignored ostracized blind-sided denied ridiculed or relegated to the back of the room; and after residing at the back of the dwell for nearly 400 years it has now grown into a ten zillion ton gorilla and it is slowly moving to the front. Last pass the gorilla yawned again. You see every now and again it yawns: just to remind folks that it’s still in the room; and last weekend. Barack Obama unveiled his nuclear weapon in this 2008 presidential race: Oprah Winfrey. Remember I told you guys in a previous bind here that if he wins this race it ordain be caused by the “Oprahcization” of America; well fasten your seatbelts folks. When he trotted her out to the campaign trail in Iowa. New Hampshire and South Carolina it was the long awaited gambit that folks like me have been praying for; but the gorilla woke up as soon as the press release was sent out that Oprah was coming to stump. Oprah had decided to put her ass on the line for an endorsement that to this date has been one of a kind. To me it was one of the greatest weekends in American political history. In frigid weather- where the temperatures were generally under the teens in Iowa- the largest crowds of this stand to date showed up. Oprah did not disappoint them; neither did Barack. At one event in South Carolina over forty thousand people showed up by the time it was over. In New Hampshire the excitement of O and O blew up the surroundings desire TNT. To me the most perspicacious observation of go in the good old USA is the awareness that on both sides of the black and color racial divide (and there are many other racial divides here): there is denial. History has perpetually exposed white people’s failings in this regard but too many blacks don’t seem to understand that they too have been profoundly affected in ways far beyond obvious legalities (violations). This weekend out of the woodwork came a former UN ambassador (during the Carter administration) to make the dumbest remark of the year. Yet as dumb as his remarks were it wasn’t the most disappointing thing to have happened; the lack of condemnations of these remarks by Jesse Jackson. Al Sharpton. Louis Farrakhan and others of that ilk left me pained; disappointment in that regard is an understatement. Andrew Young–who is probably on his way to becoming another black ass kisser for Bilary; and there are many of those all over the country- suggested that Bill Clinton is blacker than Barack Obama; and furthermore: that he has probably had more black women (meaning sexually of course) in his life time than Obama. Here again we see black women being relegated to sex-objects. Didn’t we see enough of this during slavery US-styled? Didn’t the color men of those times decrease black women to sexual conquests? Didn’t white women on the plantations ill-treat black women just because of their own awareness-that the little mulattoes running around the plantations were either their preserve’s kids or the offspring of the white males who worked there? Haven’t black women taken enough shit from the males of this country (black/white/ brown/ whatever)? In a day and age when black women are making headlines for being the fastest growing amongst new cases of HIV infection. Young makes this insipid statement. In a day and time when two out three black children are born out of wedlock (and most of them growing up without father-figures); and when the biggest contributor to the crime and violence plaguing black youth is: the missing-father syndrome (and yes this is my theory); a man prone to putting his foot in his communicate does it again. Andrew Young should be taken out to the barn and given a good old-fashioned ass-whipping. It’s only when he catches himself that he claims it was all a joke; well this isn’t funny Andrew; not by a fucking long shot. It’s all part of what I tried to explain earlier in my three-part series on Obama: those blacks who were born in the USA and who directly experienced the civil rights struggles believe that they have a fasten on “blackness”. They believe that they own it; that they could define it; and that any person born (or grew up) outside the USA isn’t black enough; and doesn’t understand the black struggle quite well enough. It’s pervasive ignorance black-styled. It’s move of a xenophobic undercurrent that peregrinates black communities all over this country. This is why Barack Obama has been catching some hits from a so many of them; this is why the silly challenge keeps coming up: is he black enough? This is why most of his supporters are white and mixed. He grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia mainly; his wasn’t a normal growing-up experience for black Americans. Plus; he was given his wings by Oprah Winfrey; someone who many black militants think is too color in her thinking. And why do they evaluate this: she is too universal in her messages and she attracts too many whites; another piece of ignorant egest that floats around black enclaves. These two beautiful humans (Oprah and Obama) who have been trying by their life’s works to transcend the iniquities of racism is in many a change intensity command castigated for this; and often times by blacks. But what can’t be stopped is the fact that those wings Oprah placed on Obama’s shoulders (last year on her television show) are going to act him to the White House eventually; unless they prematurely take him to heaven first. I will tell you why I say this in move two of this series. Hackshaw that was a thoughful blog you pasted on here. Me being an African American with Caribbean parentage. I often times get disturb with the notion that Obama isn't black. The fact that Obama didn't march with King makes him somewhat of a non-black. That is soo ridiculous. What I gather from what the other side is saying is that. " due to the fact that I didn't march with King then I won't understand the black vow and not be able to run for office and represent my community"? That is so preposterous. And to add to this issue we undergo our little friends (sharpton and jackson) crying every now and then to get in the media. I tell my black colleagues and friends who are involved in politics that the USA doesn't comprise of just black people. It comprises of all types of people. And just because they are black they shouldn't relegate themselves to just courting the black people and speaking about issues affecting them. That was sharpton's and jackson's dowfall. In refering to Mr. Young. " how can bill clinton be as every bit as black as Obama"? alter now I'm shaking my head about that response. I suppose that he might be trying to communicate nice about hillary to possibly get a post in THEIR administration? Secondly by stating that bill may have more black women than Obama took sent credibility and character to the very depths of cow dung. I evaluate this Civil Rights era generation and those you have failed to adjust to the times are trying their beat to act things in an environment familiar to them.  This is a sad comment by a once respected public figure who is seeing Dr. King's dream come true but is dismayed by the fact that it isn't himself leading the charge.  Great post.  I think that many in America are ready to move past the divides of red and blue and black and white. I read in the Washington Post the other day about an African American woman pastor and teacher.  She was thinking of supporting Clinton and her son had her read Sen. Obama's book.   so when the event with Oprah came to South Carolina she went and was profoundly touched.  She walked into the stadium where it was mostly black but alot of white people there.  and they were there for Obama.  The thought that there in the South at an event that featured 2 prominent african americans as the headliners so many whites came and were so excited and genuinely behind Obama. she went domiciliate and  it stayed on her mind and the next day signed up with the Obama campaign.  the very act of seeing that so whites in the south truly supported this African American man for president reached deeply into her soul. By the way. I am a white woman from Illinois and have already voted for Barack Obama before.  Proudly voted for him to be our senator.  and my husband and I proudly support him for president. 

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://www.r8ny.com/blog/rock_hackshaw/oprah_obama_and_the_ten_zillion_ton_gorilla_part_one_of_three.html ]]> ]]> ~Ray

]]> ]]> Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?]]> ]]> sex with more color women. "account is every bit as black as Barack.”“He’s probably gone with more black women than Barack,” Young said of former President Clinton drawing laughs from a be television audience. Young quickly followed the mention with the disclaimer. “I’m clowning.”Yes sir you are indeed clowning and a perfect example of how our Civil Rights "royal family" are no longer capable of leading Black people in a direction of political advancement. I have a feeling that Barack Obama would never make a comment about the number of (color) women he's slept with which is exactly what we be in a presidential candidate. With HIV rates within the Black community as high as they are should we really be basing a person's qualifications on the number of populate they've slept with? And... Mr. Young fucking Black women does NOT alter you a friend of the Black community. See also: Strom Thurmond. wrote:BW,You experience I think that some populate say crazy things because they experience they ordain get press. I find it hard to believe that Andy Young is this backward. wrote:everyone has their take but we all recant andy was connected to bigh multinationals so it makes sense wrote:It was an ignorant statement but it has some underlying truth. I think right now the black community is looking at account clinton vs barack rather than hilary vs barack and that's what is giving hilary the current edge. We dont really understand clearly what Barack is all about and what he stands for so we are going to go with what we are comfortable with instead at that is the clintons

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://askthisblackwoman.com/2007/12/10/andrew-young-on-barack.aspx ]]> ]]> women in the workplace. We represent individuals experiencing all forms of workplace discrimination specifically those affecting women including sexual harassment equal pay pregnancy discrimination and family and medical leave act violations. Paul Monies writes for Business WriterThe U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity equip filed suit in federal act Wednesday against local television station KOKH-25 alleging racial and gender discrimination against one of its on-air reporters. The lawsuit accuses KOKH LLC and parent company Sinclair air assort Inc of paying crime reporter Phyllis Williams a displace salary than comparable color female reporters and male reporters of all races. Williams who is black has worked at the Fox affiliate since it began news operations in 1996. The lawsuit also alleges Williams was not offered an employment assure until several months after she filed a discrimination charge with the equip in 2005. Rebecca Stith a senior trial attorney in the commission’s St. Louis. Mo. office said other reporters at KOKH routinely were offered employment contracts. “Unlike her peers she did not have a contract and was not offered one until some measure after the complaint in 2005,” Stith said. “She was certainly paid less given her longevity undergo and reputation in the community.” Barry Faber vice president and command counsel for Baltimore-based Sinclair said the company had not yet seen the lawsuit. Faber said based on his knowledge of the facts the allegations are “completely baseless.” The lawsuit seeks approve pay compensatory damages and punitive damages. The equip also wants an order to prevent Sinclair and KOKH from engaging in future discrimination. A lawsuit was filed only after it exhausted settlement talks the equip said. “News organizations must be mindful to provide compete opportunities to women and people of color who have traditionally been the victims of job discrimination,” Jean Kamp acting regional director of the commission’s St. Louis office said in a statement. “In this case the reporter received a manifold dose of discrimination based on go and sex simply for being a black woman.” XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://womensrightsny.com/blog/2007/09/20/crime/ ]]> ]]> girl who made her label writing a sex blog and now churns out execrable articles for the Guardian in breathless undergraduate style - writes gratify all of you do not express Ms R. Ms R is an extremely busy woman. Her list of exigencies is already beat. Today for example she has a session at the gym followed by a pedicure. She would go for a facial except she has 5000 words to write so she will do it at home. (Dermalogica's sieve grain rub followed by Guinot's Radiance Mask followed by a few drops of Aesop's Rose Oil. Except for the rub you can do it sitting at the computer). See. Ms R likes to look her beat. Not desire a copy because she's not. She also knows that since Caveboy Stig laid eyes on hot Cavegirl Mib populate undergo been evaluated on their looks. And the measure thing she needs while she is trying to figure when she will undergo measure to get her eyebrows done (will furnish you her name if you're in London) by this fabulous Polish girl is to be sent some hotch potch nonsense that fatuously conflates the (Extra Big breathe) exploitative lad's mags with this fundamental fact of life. So now you expect Ms R to do something about this do you? (God I can't wait until I end this arouse bring home the bacon: my nails look cover awful)Ms R is here to tell you that whether you are heaving out of your PVC dress in indignation or not you undergo to put the coloured shirts in the shop window to get people's attention. When they go in the majority ordain actually want something that has a bit of act upon but probably more serviceable. That is the command of sell And it is the command rule of life that actually applies to men as come up as women. Ms R's ex-husband is tall blonde and blue-eyed. Unlike Ms R is he is utterly conventionally good looking in a way that appeals to a large majority of populate. He is also smart. But he knows that women will come up and talk to him because he is cute. They won't stay around if he's a dumb copulate. Ms R wouldn't have. Looks attract sure. But funny and clever keeps you there. Ms R knows that being attractive has helped her get her brains noticed. She once made a communicate at a party (no she didn't have one track sex with him) and obviously her looks helped. He gave her the name of someone who gave her a very lucrative freelance job based on her brains and writing pedigree. She also knows that her ability to look good in a red D&G suit helped her change $20 million dollar ad pitches approve in the eighties. But the client would not undergo bought them if Ms R was talking fail. The partners at Andersen where Ms R led new business presentations many years ago would not have given her the measure of day if she wasn't as cause to be perceived as they thought she was. But they liked that she dressed come up and smiled at them. What they liked change surface more was that she helped them win a record number of pitches. Does the fact that Ms R made sure she looked her beat cheapen this? Thought not. We are all initially judged on our looks. That does not convey we undergo to agonise over looking desire Elle McPherson or George Clooney. Do that and you are stupid. What it does convey that we need to alter the best of what we've got; just as we need to make the beat use of our brains. It is not magazines that are telling women they need to look good: women (and men.. Men's Health is rather a good seller isn't it?) know that it's all part of the package. As any successful advertiser knows you undergo to tap into the prevailing consciousness. Ms R's age means she grew up without all those magazines that worry people so much but that hasn't stopped her wanting to have a toned body from the word go. It makes her happy. Today when Ms R goes to the gym she will work out next to a young woman who is very overweight. It's a kind of motivational friendship. The young woman is sick of being overweight. Not because a magazine told her but because she is fed up. She came up to Ms R measure week and asked her a few questions. The young woman needs to lose seven kill. Ms R agreed with her that it was a good idea but told her to act it slowly. Ms R has given her some thoughts on improving her self-esteem in the meantime. She is a smart lady but she knows she is not doing her best for herself. She also knows she won't be Claudia Schiffer. She doesn't compassionate. She just wants to be the beat version of her. She wants to grimace (which will make her more attractive) and right now she feels annoyed with herself. She knows she will be infinitely more confident and more employable if she is not obese. We discussed it. Does that alter me an enemy of women? Thought not. Before Ms R pulls on the black lycra top that shows off her toned arms (and why the copulate not?) she will get you with this: This contend for equality (dislike that phrase sorry) is not about jettisoning your looks to get your brains noticed. After all men don't do it. It's about using every weapon in your armoury to worm your way into the Citadel and plan the revolution. But looks in themselves won't do it: an attractive woman without brains will eventually cease to be attractive object to the odd investment banker and conjoin of Eurotrash.(Ms R also recommends Palmers Shea Butter as an inexpensive all over be moisturiser). I said recently that I can't feature it when I see a woman who doesn't act compassionate of her appearance and got shouted down. But I rest by what I said. If you undergo let yourself go in terms of grooming (or indeed are the sort who has never paid attention to it) then I evaluate it says a lot about the person. Every woman looks better with a good haircut some good clothes and a bit of slap. You're alter being the beat version of you is not a superficial or meaningless goal and it certainly doesn't mean you are swallowing some beauty myth. It is a fundamental move of human nature to be to look nice. And if you don't be to be nice then what the copulate is wrong with your wiring? I accept with your every evince on this. So which hack is trying to copy Naomi Klein this week then? GWAOTM? Freddy: It is one of the most common things said about me. Some people are excited by it: others are terrified. Cake: I don't do warpaint. But I believe that looking your best and making an effort is part of the whole package. It's been like that since the dawn of measure and that's just the way it is. I personally undergo found my smile to be a huge seller - as I don't do overexposed get rid of (except on the beach)and never once in the corporate world did so. I am not saying anything is right or wrong. Gosh it would be lovely if looks didn't matter. But copulate it from the cute baby upwards they do. The grimace the spirit the well cut hair and the glowing skin are all part of the case. It's not about conforming to a stereotype: it's about being the beat version of you. OK Emma. I don't know about you but I know my lack of happiness at times is not about my looks: Despite not being a great beauty I am happy with that. But I was born fragile in certain ways and a perfectionist in terms of academic achievement certainly and in fact it was the B+ one year in a report separate of Straight A's which launched me into anorexia for a year. And no celebrity magazine told me to do it. And what is happy? Sorry if that is a bit deep but I undergo reached a inform where I act the downs with the ups. Neither you nor I apply living on a plateau whereas those who do have an easier life no? I don't know about you but I regard my dark introspective moments as the flip side of the joy. I evaluate intelligence.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://womanofexperience.blogspot.com/2007/09/beauty-myth.html ]]> ]]> women that he wants abortion to be illegal and to imprison doctors. He opined that women who end during the first three months of pregnancy should not be imprisoned. So-called feminists predictably. . As the pachyderm stated in a on this subject the pro-abortion logic on this point is flawed. It turns criminal law on its continue: instead of prosecuting based on the mens rea of the perpetrator the sanctions would be based upon the victim and the identity of the perpetrator. (Well this is some of the theory behind hate-crime law which is equally misguided.) Furthermore a law can rationally penalise one actor and not another: for example many states impose much higher penalties on medicate dealers than on medicate users under the belief that the latter group is victimised by the actions of the former. Finally the so-called feminists predicate their pro-abortion beliefs upon the pain discomfort and emotional difficulty of pregnancy yet do not permit pro-lifers to use any of those as mitigating factors. (Ericka Anderson.) Fred�s lay is quite sensible. He does not want to act women who get pregnant and desire illegal abortions; however his sympathies are limited when women have been pregnant for several months and then decide that they don�t want to remain in that situation. It does not patronise women to refuse to imprison them; it only acknowledges that physical and psychic stresses of pregnancy are experienced by the pregnant woman not her abortion adulterate. mens rea. If a specific woman who requested an abortion can show that she was not capable of understanding right and wrong at the time she had the procedure then certainly she ought not be imprisoned. Nor should she if she had the baby and drowned it if she similarly couldn't comprehend right and wrong while she was pushing its head underwater. What does the individualized determination of mental health does that have to do with legislation which is one-size-fits-all? To classify all pregnant women as essentially insane is exceedingly dangerous. drop infantilization -- even juveniles approach penalties and can be tried as adults. It's the crazy who get the remove ride that Thompson and theobromophile believe all pregnant women be. And change surface NGRIs be to get shuffled to the loony bin; indeed the looseness of mental health law often allows them to be detained for longer than they necessarily would have been had they been found guilty and sentenced. They also may be forcible medicated. 2) Certainly a law can penalize one actor more than another. A express could decide to punish only drug dealers and not drug users at all which is a policy many people have urged. I'm guessing these are populate who believe the give is more important than the bespeak. Personally. I accept that whether it's drugs illegal labor abortions whatever as desire as there's a demand with money in hand the market will create a give. Indeed there's a commerce clause argument for federal legislation that prohibits commerce rather than use and I've made a similar argument with regard to in that the state has a police power to regulate commerce in something including banning such commerce but not to ban the product or function itself if freely given. However. I anticipate that Thompson would want to imprison doctors who gave free abortions yet would not punish women who self-aborted (which if the doctors had any sense of self-interest is what would come about as all the doctors refused to perform abortions knowing that their patients have no reason not to narc on them). Thus it does not appear to be either profit or the act of performing the abortion that's penalized. So what will be the crime be -- the performance of an abortion on any person except oneself? That's going to act a massive incentive for abortionists to become helpful assistants to self-abortions; expect a black market in RU-486 to explode. 3) If "hurt discomfort and emotional difficulty" should be used "as mitigating factors" not merely to decrease the penalty for a crime on an individualized basis but to declare that it is no crime at all we are back to my absurd claim at the beginning of this affix: illegal immigrants are under a hell of a lot more stress than the add up hiring manager at Tyson's Chicken so we should make the former's crime unpenalized but the latter's ground for heavy penalties. Heck one of the most reviled groups of illegal immigrants are the women who know they're pregnant and scoot across in time to have an "anchor do by," a kid who has birthright American citizenship. Should those women be excused for breaking our immigration laws because of the emotional difficulty of pregnancy? I'm anticipate that the get-out-of-jail-free card won't apply for them change surface though their impulse seems a lot more laudable than the abortion-seekers; they're trying to make their baby's life better not end it before birth. One could argue that proving the hiring manager knew the person was an illegal immigrant is difficult but if Thompson has any pre-pregnancy exception to his abortion ban -- such as cases of rape and incest -- how do we propose to prove that the abortionist wasn't told by his patient that she had been raped by her cousin but he was the provider for her family and so she couldn't report him to the police without a loss of give to all? theobromophile's framing of the women who will go scot-free for getting first-trimester abortions under Thompson's intend is very peculiar -- she refers to an interest in penalizing them as "picking on pregnant ladies." Well no. Telling a pregnant woman that if she wants an abortion she's doing it herself with a wire hanger seems to me like picking on pregnant ladies. Telling a no-longer-pregnant woman that if she asked for an abortion knowing that it was against the law she's going to jail is picking on post-abortion women. But it's not a surprising rhetorical act: pregnant ladies sympathetic propagators of the human go; no-longer-pregnant ladies merely women and no cerebrate to care about them. Maybe it's because of all the doctors in my family but I just can't get over how conservatives want to scapegoat physicians. If my cousin or my little sister (both currently in medical educate) have a woman tell them that if they don't back up her with an abortion she'll act it on herself. I would like for their first reaction to be to find a way for the woman to end her pregnancy. I anticipate that if Thompson doesn't be to imprison women for having had abortions he's not going to advocate having pregnant women detained in state custody until they deliver so they'll undergo to persuade her that termination is not the right choice. However if she is determined to have an abortion. I would want them to help her to undergo a proper medical abortion that is the least physically traumatic for her and the fetus. I don't want them telling her. "Sorry. I'm not going to jail for you in case you the nurse or someone else rats me out for doing this." Gratitude is not a dependable guarantor of conquer. Should the woman later be convinced by theobromophile that her abortionist actually was an evil manipulator she's giving up that label without a second thought. Incidentally if Fred Thompson's enforcers are reading this let me say that my cousin would have the "Sorry" response my little sister might not. She might decide this.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://www.blogdenovo.org/archives/1818.html ]]> ]]>
Click Here to See The Real Me!]]> ]]> his IQ's higher than Chewie's but he's certainly had more formal scientific training. The Chick: Rogue -- I'd like to compete against assort and Lancer: Black Canary -- As much as I desire Black Canary's leading the JLA right now. I'd like to see query Woman do it more. But Canary would alter a hell of a lieutenant. Big Guy: Worf -- Not as strong as Wonder Woman but the strongest of the rest of them. The Chick: Shang Chi -- He choose of falls here by default. I'm not really sure what defines the "Chick" role but he the odd man out in the group. If you think the team would be improved by swapping one engrave between the even and odd groups which ones would you switch?Just because Chewie and Sasquatch are so similar. I'm gonna change by reversal Chewie with Shang Chi. Chewie's got some feminine qualities and Shang Chi more than makes up in skill what he lacks in brutishness. So new teams... Leader: TarzanLancer: BondBig Guy: Shang ChiSmart Guy: SasquatchThe Chick: Rogue Leader: Wonder WomanLancer: Black CanaryBig Guy: WorfSmart Guy: HolmesThe Chick: Chewbacca Gender-swap 2. 8 & 10. Which character would undergo the most dress in their story arc? Which the least? Would any of these characters undergo to have a end personality dress to be believable as the opposite sex? Shang Chi would have the most change in his story arc because of his father's attitude towards women. Fu Manchu had a daughter in the one movie I've seen so far and he was pretty willing to just work her out. Whereas Shang Chi was trained in kung fu in request to be an assassin. Worf would probably dress the least because he was raised in the Federation which is much more egalitarian in its treatment of women than Victorian society. In other words. Worf would still be able to advance in Starfleet as a woman in the same way he did as a man. Holmes on the other hand wouldn't undergo been as popular with the guard and his other clients. analyse the matchups of 1 & 8 and 5 & 9. (Ignore canon sexual preferences for the moment.) Which bring together would be more compatible? I can't imagine a more different pairing culturally than Bond and Shang Chi. And neither are very open people. They'd respect each other but they'd never be close. Sasquatch and Chewie on the other transfer. I evaluate would be great friends. They're very similar. Which couple would be more plausible to populate from either principal's home grow? Ironically the least compatible couple is the most plausible. At least they're both members of the same species. Your aggroup is 3. 4 & 9. The mission consists of a social contend a mental challenge and a physical contend. Which team member do you assign to each challenge? Tarzan. Wonder Woman and Chewie. Though Wonder Woman would excel in all three she gets the social contend because the other two would be so bad at it. Chewie's pretty smart but he's easily rattled so I'm putting him in the physical contend and letting the cooler Tarzan take the mental one. 7 becomes 1's boss for a week in some plausible fashion. How's their working relationship? I don't evaluate attach's a misogynist but he does see women as having definite roles and (Judi Dench aside since we're talking about the literary attach) I don't see him answering to a woman very well. Nor do I see Rogue putting up with his crap. At all. This isn't going to be pretty. 2 finds him/her/itself inserted into 6's continuity. As far as anyone other than 2 or 6 is concerned they've always been there. What role would 2 be presumed to undergo had in 6's story and could they fit in without going wonky? As far as fitting Holmes into Canary's story that's pretty easy since they're both basically in the same lie of work. Canary's cases are more fantastic than Holmes' but it's not a be to imagine their paths crossing at some point. 3 and 5 get three wishes. The catch is that they undergo to accept on all three wishes before they get the benefits of any of them..

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://michaelmay.blogspot.com/2007/09/thanks-for-memeories.html ]]> ]]>

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://www.vsocial.com/video/?d=110216 ]]> ]]> black women have such a hard measure growing lengthy locks color women don’t have to struggle with growing our hair The following 5 myths have contributed to the lack of hair growth in black women 1. Black Women Can’t Grow Hair: This is just an out and out lie. Do other ethnic groups have a genetic monopoly on desire hair. Is there something special or flawed about black hair that prevents it from growing. Is there some funky gene tied to melanin that prevents hair growth. No no and no. color women can grow hair. Black women do grow hair. Don’t you undergo to go for a touch-up on your relaxer or color every 6 to 8 weeks. Then your hair is growing. The question is how to act it on your head. color hair has special needs and can’t be treated like straight hair which leads us straight to our other myth. 2. Only �Mixed’ Women Can change Hair: Another long-standing lie. There is a cerebrate that mixed women tend to have longer hair. Sometimes not all of the times. �mixed’ women undergo a looser curl. The looser the curl the more that it retains moisture.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://steven17.blubz.com/2007/09/21/top-5-black-hair-growth-myths/ ]]> ]]> toying with another blessing and a real eye-opener to bigotry that I must comfort be on guard against against myself. I've learned a LOT. The one thing that comfort perplexes me is what I create verbally of here. Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah. If you're expecting "cat-fights" or wet t-shirt contests this is the do by affix for you. Yet at the risk of sounding like the web's do misogynist I worry I must create verbally this post regardless if only to try to obtain understanding of some choose. The understanding I seek is of not only the almost instinctual female way of socialization but also of fighting. As you may have guessed dear readers. I am one of those women who go outside of the category of "women who understand other women". They bedevil me more than they bedevil straight men who at least get some insights in romantic situations. I could alter horrendously and just express that women sink to devastating bouts of backstabbing which is adjust of all too many women but that would do nothing to obtain understanding and ennoble knows. I do want to understand. If I could act them up to my Mother-Ship and chew over them erase memories etc. women would be my first subjects of study. As it is. I must stick to careful observation and the occasional musing in prose. I realized that this problem was far bigger than just me when my beloved Dad (God rest his soul) began calling me asking the very same questions I have. You see my Father was born with the same obsessive honesty that gets me into trouble on a daily basis though he was rather gifted at at least socializing with others. He was even in a Fraternity and was quite comfortable discussing sports (he change surface liked sports). So in a way he was do by. I am not his end clone aside from the fact that I am female. He did undergo some advantages that I lack but then I am a product of my environment. Nature Vs. Nurture as the old consider goes. I learned early to fear members of my own sex/gender and was also not fully accepted as a peer amongst heterosexual men for the obvious reason that I'm a chick. A chick who uses the call "chick" no less. My Dad loved his job loved and was extremely loyal to his employers. He was as I say an extremely honest man. He refused offers from competing corporations for jobs continuing to use his undergo only to further the company he worked for. He change surface used to work Saturdays for quite some time. Very old school in his bring home the bacon ethic which was reflected in his preference of colleagues who he viewed as honest and talented rather than the climb-the-ladder types. But then he had also been in business desire enough to undergo seen enough younger folks register the field with their heads rather inflated. Mostly he was kind and encouraging to all. He never spoke an unkind word of any of his colleagues even though he began calling me with reports of his days at work (and I mean beat exhaustive reports in phone calls lasting upwards of 2 hours) at least 3-4 years prior to his premature death (he passed away on September 10th. 2003 of a hit tumor). Never an unkind evince of anyone save Madame Voldemort a wretched creature I have not spoken of in years. Dad's words regarding Mme. Voldemort weren't even particularly unkind as much as honestly asking brainstorming with me the manner of female fighting so particular to the gender as to not be able to be replicated among the male sex for the most part. In my create's need to understand his business adversary who had begun a full-on campaign to try and get my create fired tarred and feathered maligned etc. he unfortunately reached out to the one person closest to him who was also the least able to be of help: me. Regular readers are aware of the troubles I've had with a family on my street in recent months. No. I won't delve approve into their familial wickedness but to say that the matriarch of the family was a prime example of this type of backstabbing and dishonest female little different than Ms. Voldemort. In a discussion of the affairs on my street with another resident of this subdivision another woman-who-doesn't-understand-women we ended up discussing this problem at length which is one of the ways in which we undergo ended up friends. As is typical of our kind we only are able to befriend members of our own sex/gender who do not understand the majority of human females. There seemed to be a way of socialization a pack orientation if you will apparent as early as Kindergarten. That at least was the first measure I was dragged into a confrontation. I comfort remember the girl who was named Catherine and her somehow organizing the categorise's girls in some choose of attack on me. I was oblivious to the entire machination of this happy playing with my male classmates and when finally confronted during "playtime" my response was very typical of me. I was quite enjoin with Catherine. She and her "case" had decided that I was a "boy" and that they didn't desire me (I on the other hand had failed to change surface notice their existence only noting that they were absolutely not interesting in any way to me personally prior to this event). I asked her some absurd egging-on questing that I cannot possibly bequeath nowadays but I bequeath her defiant crossing of her arms with her forgotten verbal response. What could I do? I had to defend myself against an attack such as this so I reacted exactly as I had been socialized to react: I punched Catherine in the face. A good hit too not a girly one. Knocked her alter off of the steps she was on. Another really bad move on her part in my estimation insulting someone who was standing higher on the stairs than yourself. She went right down. Hard. Crying. I was content that the situation had been resolved as it should undergo been. My teacher begged to differ. She was horrified. Utterly. Girls didn't act that way. We were supposed to act desire "little ladies" whatever that meant and I was promptly sent to a corner which just sent my reputation a few rungs higher in my male classmates' opinions. I didn't change as completely confused by such subterfuges until higher up in the Elementary School plot of things particularly when the boys stopped wanting so much to compete with the one girl who could really kick their butts in four-square. Then it was easier to notice that the girls had some sort of hierarchy of socialization one which was completely undecipherable and impossible to simply join. come up impossible if you wanted to remain true to yourself. Hell. I was the kid so obsessed with honesty that I preferred Bert to Ernie. C-3PO to R-2. OK? I was a bona fide freak straight out of the womb. Generally. I have ignored this choose of nonsense throughout my life just as I did in Kindergarten surfacing to notice it only when it became necessary to call the woman out in direct confrontation. For I am a person who deals primarily in enjoin confrontation. Subterfuge.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://whatwouldcharlesmarteldotm.blogspot.com/2007/09/bitches-hos-bitches-hos-female-fighting.html ]]> ]]> links to she posts a warning. I don’t get triggered despite my dislike of watching women get abused and humiliated so the warning didn’t deter me. Here’s my own warning: It’s not for those of weak stomachs. The bit that interested me the most was “The Vomitorium” (move to the bottom). Per the place. “[W]hores have a tough time holding drink their meals when they’re being throatfucked with within an advance of their worthless lives. That’s where we go in. We lens the puking…” As it happens. I’m no stranger to the puking-while-attempting-a-blow-job. One was consensual and naturally promptly ended when the puking accident happened. The other wasn’t consensual and didn’t end. Neither was pleasurable. Throwing up isn’t fun. I am irritated with people who truly seem to believe that if they don’t enjoy something or if something fails to turn them on it must be so for everyone. I usually don’t go down that road myself and have looked at extreme BDSM pictures (one of a person I have been in the same room with who does BDSM as hardcore as it is possible to do) without feeling a conviction one way or the other as to the feelings and sensations of the person involved or of those who decide to watch that sort of thing. But I undergo to query does anyone — anyone at all — enjoy throwing up with a dick down their throats? And change surface if they did is that really a sexual thing which someone could check and get off on? I can even understand getting off on getting shat on but I can’t understand orgasming because someone threw up. I wanted to construe Ren’s act on the misogynistic porn affect change surface more after checking out her porn links so I open her two posts on the subject. Actually just the doesn’t say much more. All right so there’s a bespeak and there’s a supply. Men hate women because women are suddenly uppity and they conclude oppressed and angry. They’re confused the poor babies and who better to act it out on than women? These appear more desire rationalizations to me than explanations. Because women have far more reason to conclude oppressed by men far more cause for anger and yet we women don’t undergo a desire to see men abused on enter. Here’s an explanation for why men want it and women don’t despite having more ’create’: Because men have been taught and socialized to beat out. They’re taught that it’s authorise to ascribe their own insecurity anger and failures and the grow implicitly informs them that women are handy recipients/receptacles of this. Women meanwhile have been taught that. [cerebrate is to a post by Reclusive Leftist which features an incredibly disturbing video of a woman being verbally and physically abused by her preserve while she is apologetic and fearful. The video was filmed by the woman’s 13-year-old son who joins in the verbal abuse at one point and at another can’t bring himself to point the camera at his mom being beaten by his dad.] What I see in porn desire what I linked to above is a symptom rather than something that is problematic in itself. I find it disturbing that something completely non-erotic (change surface inform is more erotic than throw-up — at least it’s connected to a ‘dirty bit’) something usually associated with sickness something that I wouldn’t be surprised often happens during assail should be presented as jerk-off material. Note this is different from assail porn. Things come about during rape that are entirely non-erotic change surface for those who would get off on assail things that undergo no semblance to sex. And I’m change surface more disturbed that women let themselves be used as jerk-off material for men who really truly dislike them. create by mental act this: I’m a black girl and there’s a market for color men peeing into the communicate of a black girl. So I let myself be tied up and let a go of white men rest over me calling me nigger and peeing into my mouth forcing me to swallow and laughing and jeering as they do it. Then they turn me around and ass-rape me with a broom-stick. Let’s say the enter also shows blood coming out of my ass (which doesn’t have to be real but the viewer wouldn’t experience). Yeah you color folk hate me and I’m going to back up you get off on it. And yet? I would be wondering how a black girl could do that to herself and I would be disgusted that anyone would make money off that kind of thing and I’d be very disturbed at what it says about how white populate want to treat black populate and aren’t even ashamed enough of it to hide it. Men have plenty of horrible impulses that we force them to control through laws. Yes it may not be the done thing to bring up child porn in this context but really what’s the difference in principle? If mere desire/demand is enough to supply anything — anything at all — then why isn’t child porn okay? Let’s say not child porn — let’s say Lolita porn. Those kids are old enough to fuck and I evaluate change surface should be allowed to. Why not sight the least developed among 12-13 year olds and make porn for the starved pedophiles among us? (Let’s forget the legal age barriers for now — I’m asking a moral challenge: Why evaluate of one morally and not the other assuming nothing is illegal?) Why must we as a society disapprove of (not ban just disapprove of and refuse to patronize) porn that sexualizes and commodifies children before they have the tools to deal with the ramifications why must we as a society disapprove of porn that dehumanizes and abuses on racist grounds and not do the same for women? “I am not by discussing these topics attempting to forgive or legitimize the behavior of anyone in anyway; I am merely bringing some theories to the delay. Nor do I think all men who watch porn rough or otherwise share these views on women society or sexuality as a whole.” Those posts were written after a whole lot of observation and yep talking to people (even men). In no way was I attempting to blame women for anything. I’d desire to alter sure that is abundently clear. People ask why is porn misogynistic. I offered theories (based on actually talking to and observing people). Not my accuse if populate don’t like them and in no way was that an “oh pity the poor menz affix” but not my accuse if populate fail to see that as come up. “Why defend act to inform try to excuse and cater to men’s overwhelming desire to see women beaten drink raped and degraded? And what kind of a woman who has other choices facilitates this egest? I understand that things won’t just disappear because I come about to have different tastes. I don’t expect them to. But at least I can say. “I won’t be a move of this.”” But out of curiosity…who do you speculate makes more money of the slut shaming abuse and terror of women…JM Productions the Hollywood Film companies that put out cram desire “Captivity” or oh. NBC who makes Law & Order Special.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://apostate.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/the-vomitarium/ ]]> ]]>
check out the... Eva Longoria Sex Tape]]> ]]> stories and suggesting she was raped by other than three men. The next day. Cheshire Wilson a police inform from Officer Gwen Sutton who recorded Mangum’s inconsistent assertions (including a claim that there were five not three rapists). Cheshire noted. “Since you are the govern Attorney’s Investigator the touch could have assumed—falsely as it turns out—that you had actually read your file. I can only assume your motivation in questioning my assertion was simply ignorance. A simple reading of your register might understand that problem in the future.” I’ve been a reader of this blog since quite near to its beginning. I’ve made a considerable be of anonymous posts over the continue of time between then and now. Here’s something to think about somewhat off-topic but it fits in with the overall theme here (exposing truth through cerebrate investigate debate and testing):There is a good case to be made that George Soros is KGB. Let this change posture in and then believe the implications if true. Now believe that this only really works if this is a secret; the vast majority of those who sight themselves aligned and allied with his causes would necessarily not experience and it is not desire you can call up KGB/FSB and ask them for a compose or to confirm employment history. This leaves it to you to evaluate about and investigate if so inclined. And no no one is claiming that Soros is a communist. Intelligence feature So many of the comments refer to alleged actions occuring in the past. ".. things that happened in the past..."".. all the black women who were violated by drunken color men in the American South over the centuries..."".. racial and sexual stereotypes..."I evaluate these people are absolutely alter to insist the wrongs of the past and seek alter. And in that believe. I'd desire to say that I am particularly incensed by the pagan sacrilege of the Romans when they invaded England. I'm frankly quite pissed off at the "take no prisoners" attitude of the Mongols under the leadership of Genghis Khan and the numerous rapes perpetrated by those under his dominate. The attitude of the Islamic nations during the measure of the crusades was particularly egregious; they asserted the primality of 'Allah.' Yet the Islamic nations never offered create of Allah's relation to God. How could these populate be allowed to communicate such blasphemous assertions change surface to the modern day?Finally the Mexican invasion of Texas and the slaughter of all defenders of the Alamo deserves singular criticise. If I was Jewish. I'd invoke the Godwin principle and ask that the holocaust be a subject for restitution. But I'll stick with the Mongols the medieval Muslim nations the Mexicans under Antonio López de Santa Anna and the Romans. That's all the feed I can grate at this measure. come up dang. If I'd known there was a possibility of another installment. I certainly would undergo nominated Hal "Couldn't-Find-It-With-Both-Hands-A-Flashlight-And-GPS" Crowther:"Innocent was the word in general use though all the Attorney command had actually determined was that they couldn’t be convicted—and shouldn’t undergo been indicted—on these charges brought by this witness (doesn’t that make them less innocent technically than say. O. J. Simpson who was actually acquitted?)."What the Attorney General "had actually determined" in fact was that there was no credible evidence of an assault happening that night one of the reasons he did take the almost unprecedented step of declaring the three players -- yes. Hal -- innocent. Of cover you couldn't have expected poor Hal to know that. After all it was only in the Attorney command's press conference and his touch channel; how could they ever expect him to sight such conceal information? #10 Lynne Duke:"She was white they were black and go and sex were in the air." Must have had the radio on when you wrote that babe! You gave Nifong and Wilson a love song to sing to Crystal Gayle! "Love is in the Air" (John Paul Young)"Love is in the airEverywhere I be aroundLove is in the airEvery sight and every soundAnd I don't experience if I'm being foolishDon't experience if I'm being wiseBut it's something I must believe inAnd it's there when I be in your eyesLove is in the airIn the whisper of the treesLove is in the airIn the move of the seaAnd I don't know if I'm just dreamingDon't experience if I conclude saneBut it's something I must believe inAnd it's there when you call out my nameLove is in the airLove is in the airOh oh ohOh oh ohLove is in the airIn the rising of the sunLove is in the airWhen the day is nearly doneDon't know if you're an illusionDon't experience if I see it trueBut you're something that I must believe inAnd you're there when I reach out for youLove is in the airEvery sight and every soundAnd I don't know if I'm being foolishDon't know if I'm being wiseBut it's something that I must believe inAnd it's there when I be in your eyes." Below is an excerpt of an article in today's H-S. As you can see. Durham steeps its youth in "all things 'race' ". Here you can see that even church events become places for concocting scenarios of injustice. This is really quite sick.***************************************When Takera Nichols a junior at Durham Performance Learning Center began attending statewide perform youth events she noticed that her youth group stuck out. "It's something that everybody noticed," Takera said. Other youths would dress their language or act so-called "black," she said. In the video other youths talked about how their white counterparts would assume they liked hot act or used words desire "shizzle." The Durham youths open that for some color North Carolina Lutheran teenagers their experience with the African-American population was through stereotypical media images. The video also talks about the different ways racism arises from either ignorance or malice and how it is passed down to children like a family heirloom. The video was shown at the annual assembly of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America's North Carolina Synod and provided to all 238 congregations. The Rev. Leonard H. Bolick bishop of the synod said this week that the DVD was given to all churches because it lifts up the air of racism across the perform which needs to address the air. "The video does this in a helpful way. It's like one part of the family telling the other move of the family where it needs to spend some measure and effort," Bolick said. "I am proud of the youth group their leaders. Pastor Myers and the whole congregation who were in various ways instrumental in producing this helpful resource," he said. Takera said she hopes the video ordain alter her Lutheran brothers and sisters evaluate about it. DVDs go with a leader's discussion guide. "Your tongue is a powerful weapon. You've got to be careful what you say to populate," she said. Morris said that as some populate get older they cognise what they said was childish. "With age comes maturity but some populate don't dress," Morris said. Some of the youths involved desire Morris have moved on to college. Shavon Alston a Southern High educate graduate featured in the DVD is now a sophomore at N. C. Central University. Others are in college at NCCU. N. C. A&T the University of.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

Related article:
http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2007/09/from-quotes-file.html ]]>